WhatsApp Tests New Feature to Show Online Contacts in a Single List
WhatsApp is testing a new feature that will display all online contacts in a single list on both Android and iPhone. The feature aims to make it easier to see who is currently active on the platform.
WhatsApp is developing a feature that will aggregate all currently online contacts into a single, easily accessible list. The update is currently undergoing testing on both Android and iOS devices, according to reports from beta testers.
The new functionality will appear as a dedicated section within the app, showing a real-time list of contacts who are actively using WhatsApp. This eliminates the need to scroll through individual chats to determine a person's online status.
Currently, WhatsApp users can see if a contact is online only by opening a specific chat or viewing the contact's profile. The upcoming feature centralizes this information, providing a quick overview of all active users at a glance.
Beta testers have reported that the feature is being tested in the latest versions of the app for Android and iPhone. It is not yet clear when the feature will be rolled out to all users, as testing is still in its early stages.
WhatsApp has not officially announced the feature, but its appearance in beta builds suggests it may be released in a future update. The company often tests new features with a limited group of users before a wider launch.
The feature could be particularly useful for users who want to initiate conversations with contacts who are currently active, potentially improving response times. It may also help users avoid sending messages to people who are offline.
Privacy implications are also a consideration, as the feature could make it easier for others to track when a user is online. WhatsApp may need to balance convenience with user privacy preferences, possibly by allowing users to opt out of appearing in the online list.
As of now, no official release date has been provided. The feature remains in testing, and WhatsApp has not confirmed whether it will be included in a future public update.
Meta’s Settlement Opens Pandora’s Box: Nearly 6,000 Lawsuits Loom
Meta reached a settlement in the first major lawsuit over student mental health costs, potentially setting a precedent for nearly 6,000 similar cases against social media giants.
Meta has agreed to settle the first major lawsuit linking its platforms to student mental health issues, a move that could open the floodgates for thousands of similar claims. The settlement, whose terms were not disclosed, resolves a case brought by a group of school districts and families alleging that Instagram and Facebook contributed to a youth mental health crisis. Legal experts say this agreement may serve as a template for roughly 6,000 pending lawsuits against Meta and other social media companies.
The original lawsuit, filed in 2022, accused Meta of designing addictive features that harmed teenagers’ mental well-being, leading to increased costs for schools and families. Plaintiffs argued that the company violated public nuisance laws by failing to warn about the risks. The settlement avoids a potentially lengthy trial and sets a financial benchmark for future cases, though Meta admitted no wrongdoing.
Nearly 6,000 similar cases are consolidated in multidistrict litigation before a California federal judge. These suits, brought by school districts, parents, and attorneys general, seek damages for costs related to mental health treatment, counseling, and educational disruptions. The Meta settlement could accelerate negotiations, as plaintiffs’ lawyers now have a concrete reference point for compensation.
Meta stated that the settlement reflects its commitment to addressing youth safety concerns, but critics argue it falls short of forcing systemic changes. The company has faced mounting pressure from lawmakers and regulators over its impact on minors, including testimony from whistleblowers and leaked internal research showing awareness of harm.
The settlement covers only the initial case, leaving the broader litigation unresolved. However, it may encourage other defendants, such as TikTok and Snapchat, to pursue similar resolutions. Legal analysts note that the sheer volume of cases could overwhelm the court system, making settlements more likely.
School districts involved in the litigation have reported rising costs for mental health services, which they attribute to social media use. The settlement provides some financial relief but does not mandate changes to Meta’s products. Future cases may demand stricter design modifications or algorithmic transparency.
Meta’s stock remained stable after the announcement, suggesting investors view the settlement as manageable. The company has set aside reserves for legal liabilities, though the total payout across all cases could reach billions if other lawsuits follow suit.
The next hearing in the multidistrict litigation is scheduled for March 2025, where a judge may set a timeline for bellwether trials. Until then, Meta’s settlement stands as a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle over social media’s role in adolescent mental health.
Australian court upholds A$650,000 fine against Elon Musk's X over child safety violations
An Australian federal court upheld a fine of A$650,000 against Elon Musk's X for failing to comply with child internet safety regulations. The decision concludes a three-year legal battle between the tech company and Australian authorities.
An Australian federal court has upheld a A$650,000 fine against Elon Musk's social media platform X for violating child internet safety regulations. The ruling brings an end to a three-year legal dispute between the company and Australian regulators.
The fine was originally imposed by Australia's eSafety Commissioner, who found that X failed to adequately address child sexual abuse material on its platform. The company contested the penalty, arguing that the regulations were overly broad and that it had taken reasonable steps to comply.
Justice Geoffrey Kennett of the Federal Court dismissed X's appeal, stating that the company had not met its obligations under Australia's Online Safety Act. The court found that X did not provide sufficient information about its efforts to detect and remove child sexual abuse content.
The eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, welcomed the decision, emphasizing that tech companies must prioritize child safety. She noted that the fine was a necessary measure to hold platforms accountable for their responsibilities.
X, which has faced similar regulatory challenges in other countries, argued that the Australian rules imposed unreasonable burdens on global platforms. The company said it would review the court's ruling before deciding on further legal options.
The case is part of a broader push by Australian authorities to enforce stricter online safety standards. The government has introduced legislation requiring tech companies to report and remove harmful content more aggressively.
Australia's Online Safety Act, enacted in 2021, gives regulators the power to issue fines of up to A$555,000 for non-compliance. The fine against X was one of the first major penalties imposed under the law.
The court's decision is final, with no further avenue for appeal. X must pay the fine within 28 days or face additional penalties.
Meta Tests New 'Forum' App for Facebook Groups, Resembling Reddit
Meta has begun testing a new app called Forum on the App Store without an official announcement. The app aims to let users follow discussions from Facebook Groups in a single feed, offering a Reddit-like experience.
Meta has started testing a new application named Forum on the App Store, though the company has not made any official announcement about it. The app is designed to help users more easily track conversations within Facebook Groups by aggregating them into a unified feed based on their interests. Meta describes Forum as a dedicated space for conversations that people find most important.
The structure of Forum closely resembles that of Reddit, aiming to provide a similar user experience. Users can browse content from various Facebook Groups through a single platform and receive answers to their questions from real people. Access to Forum requires a Facebook account, and user activity is linked to their main Facebook profile.
Despite the connection to Facebook profiles, users have the option to use pseudonyms within the app. However, group administrators retain the ability to see users' real identities. Unlike the main Facebook feed, Forum focuses exclusively on group discussions, offering content recommendations tailored to individual interests.
Meta has integrated artificial intelligence features into Forum. One tool, called Ask, scans content across groups to find answers to users' questions. Another feature is an AI assistant designed to help group administrators with content moderation tasks.
At this stage, Forum is in a testing phase, and Meta has stated that development will continue based on user feedback. The company has not provided a timeline for a broader release or when the app might be officially launched.
The app is currently available for download on the App Store, but it remains unclear how widely it has been rolled out or which regions have access. Meta has not disclosed any plans for an Android version or additional platforms.
Forum represents Meta's latest effort to enhance the group experience on its platform, potentially competing with community-driven platforms like Reddit. The company emphasized that the app is still being refined and that user input will guide its evolution.








